For six years in the late 1970s-80s, William LePar offered a Bible Study on the Book of John. This was a detailed study, verse by verse. Once transcribed this study filled seven volumes. They are now all available for purchase. We thought that an example of the depth of study was appropriate. Verses 1-11 of chapter two were selected.
NIV (New International Version) – On
the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there, and Jesus and his
disciples had also been invited to the wedding. When the wine was gone, Jesus’
mother said to him, “They have no more wine.” “Dear woman, why do you involve
me?” Jesus replied. “My time has not yet come.” His mother said to the
servants, “Do whatever he tells you.” Nearby stood six stone water jars, the
kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to
thirty gallons. Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water”; so they
filled them to the brim. Then he told them, “Now draw some out and take it to
the master of the banquet.” They did so, and the master of the banquet tasted
the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come
from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the
bridegroom aside and said, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then
the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have
saved the best till now.” This, the first of his miraculous signs, Jesus
performed at Cana in Galilee. He thus revealed
his glory, and his disciples put their faith in him.
Here are some clues
as to the meanings of the miracle at Cana.
Jewish legalism is represented by the water of ritual purification; it then
becomes the Gospel, the wine which gladdens the Marriage Feast of the Kingdom of God. Judaism is represented by the
water. Christianity is represented by the wine. It is Christ that makes the
difference between water and wine. Therefore, the choice – living the strict
laws created by the Jewish system which Christ opposed or living the law of
love as Christ demonstrated. The lesson that we must learn then is not only to
be transformed by Christ’s power, but in the context of joyous human
fellowship. We must reject the spirit of gloomy religiosity that was prevalent
at that time and is carried forward today by some.
Now some historical
facts about Jewish weddings at that time: A wedding was a very notable
occasion. One of the Jewish laws was that a wedding of a virgin should take
place on a Wednesday. The wedding festivities lasted more than just one day.
The actual wedding ceremony took place in the evening after the main feast. The
couple did not go away for a honeymoon. They stayed at home and kept an open
house for about a week. At a Jewish feast, wine was essential. The saying of
the Rabbi at that time was, “Without wine there is no joy.” The people were not
drunkards. Drunkenness was a great disgrace. Hospitality in the East was a
sacred duty. So, for the food and drink to fail at a wedding feast would be a
terrible humiliation for the bride and groom.
For Mary to
approach Jesus about the problem of the lack of wine would indicate that Mary
held a certain position as far as the wedding was concerned. This indicates
that possibly one of the two in the wedding was a member of her family. Whether
it was an immediate member or secondary, the event would still be important to
her.
The Authorized
Version of King James makes Jesus’ reply sound very discourteous or very
abrupt. That was not the case. Those are the correct words, but do not give the
true meaning. “What have I to do with thee?” was a common conversational
phrase. It did not indicate disagreement or reproach, but means the indication
of misunderstanding. The meaning of the phrase could mean: “Don’t worry,” “You
don’t quite understand what is going on,” “Leave things to me” or “I will
settle them in my own way.” We see Jesus then as telling His mother to leave
the situation to Him, and He will deal with it in His own way.
The word “woman”
(the Greek word “gunai”) is also misleading. It sounds rough and abrupt, but
this is the same word used when Jesus, on the cross, addressed John concerning
His Mother, Mary, as He left her in the care of John. Christ gave His mother
into John’s care and universally, to all of us. “Woman” is a title of respect.
There is no word in the English language that gives us an exact rendering, but
it is possibly better translated as “lady,” which gives us at least the
courtesy indicated by it. Mary had confidence in Jesus. She told the servants
to do as He said.
The word “firkin”
has been translated in the Authorized Version as stone jars. A “firkin”
represents the Hebrew measure called “bath” which represents a large jug of
about a 20-gallon capacity. It also represented the purification ceremony. The
purification ceremony had two purposes: First, it was required to wash the feet
whenever entering the house. On dry days the feet were dusty and on wet days
the feet were muddy.
Second, it was
required to wash the hands. Strict Jews washed their hands before the meal and
between each course. First the hands were held upright and the water was poured
over them in such a way that it ran right down to the wrists. Then the hands
were pointed down and the water was poured in such a way that it ran from the
wrist to the fingertips and this was done with each hand. Then each palm was
cleansed by rubbing it with the fist of the other hand. If this was not done,
technically the hands were unclean.
John definitely
states that the jugs were filled to the brim. He makes this point clear to show
that there was nothing else in there but the water.
We now note three
general things about the miracle that Jesus performed. We note when it happened
– at a wedding feast. Jesus was no severe austere killjoy. He enjoyed sharing
in the happiness and rejoicing of a wedding feast. Some religious people like to
shed gloom wherever they go. They are suspicious of any joy and happiness. To
them, religion is a thing of black clothes and lowered voices and the expulsion
of all social fellowship. These people would be better as undertakers and bury
the dead for they will not succeed in influencing the living. It is better to
commend cheerfulness to all who wish to win souls, not levity or frothfulness,
but geniality and happy spirit. There are more flies caught with honey than
vinegar, and there will be more souls led to Heaven by a man who wears Heaven
in his face than one who bears grimness in his look. Jesus never counted it a
crime to be happy, so why should His followers?
We note where it
happened. It happened in a modest home in a village in Galilee.
This miracle was not performed against the background of a great occasion or
vast crowds. Looking briefly at the Gospel of Luke, we see the author delights
in showing Jesus against the background of very simple things, homey things and
people such as oxen and servants. Luke domesticates God. Luke brings God right
into the home circle and into the ordinary things of life. With the miracle at Cana, this shows us what Christ thought of the home. His
first public miracle was in the sanctity of the home. As the RSV (Revised
Standard Version) states it, “He manifested forth His glory.” We can understand
from this, that to Christ the home was a place for which nothing but the best
was good enough.
We note why it
happened. In the East, hospitality was a sacred duty. If the wine at the
marriage feast had run out, it would have been a great embarrassment and shame
on the home. So it was to save this humble Galilean family from hurt and
embarrassment. It was in sympathy, in kindness, in understanding for the simple
people that Jesus acted. There is a kind of natural human malice that enjoys
seeing the misfortunes of others. The Lord of Life, the King of Joy, used His
power to save the bride and bridegroom from humiliation. It is by such deeds of
understanding and simple kindness that we can also show that we are followers
of Jesus Christ.
There are two other
things the story tells us about Mary’s faith in Christ. First, Mary
instinctively turned to Jesus because she knew her son, and she knew that He
would not let her down. Second, she believed in Him and she immediately turned
to the serving people and told them to do whatever they were instructed by
Jesus to do. She did not know what to expect, but she had faith that He would
do the right thing. In every life there comes a period of darkness when we,
too, do not know what to expect. By placing our faith in Jesus Christ, all
things are fulfilled.
Also, the story
tells us something about Jesus. “My hour has not yet come.” All through His
life Jesus knew He came into the world for a definite purpose and a definite
task. He saw His life, not in terms of His wishes, but in terms of God’s
purpose for Him. He saw His life not against the shifting background of time,
but against the steady background of eternity. He steadily went towards that
hour for which He knew He had come into the world. It is not only Jesus Who
came into this world to fulfill the purpose of God. Every man is a dream and an
idea of God, so we too, must think not of our own wishes and our own desires,
but of the purpose for which God sent us into this world.
Now for the deeper,
more permanent truth that John is telling us with this story. We must remember
that John was writing with a double background. He was a Jew and he was writing
the story of Jesus for the Greeks and the rest of mankind to come. We must remember
that beneath John’s simple stories there is always a deeper meaning, which is
opened only to those who have eyes to see. John never wrote an unnecessary word
or insignificant word. Everything means something and everything points beyond.
There were six
water pots. The water in them turned to wine. According to the Jews, seven is
the number which is complete and perfect. Six is the number which is unfinished
or imperfect. The six stone (stone=dead) water pots stand for the imperfection
of the Jewish Law. Jesus came to do away with the imperfection of the Law and
to put in its place the Wine of the New Gospel of Grace (God’s gift that we
don’t deserve) or the New Covenant that man has with his God. Jesus turned the
imperfection of the Law into the perfection of Grace. There were six water
pots, each held between 20 and 30 gallons of water. Jesus turned water into
wine that would give up to 180 gallons. Simply to state that fact is to show
that John did not mean the story to be taken with crude literalness.
What John is saying
is that when the Grace of Christ comes to men, there is enough to spare for
all. It would be unlikely that a wedding party would drink 180 gallons of wine.
No need on earth can exhaust the Grace of Christ. There is a glorious superabundance
of it. What John was telling us is that in Christ, imperfections become
perfection. Grace is without limit, sufficient, and more than sufficient, for
every need. We see that John is teaching us that Jesus does not do a thing once
and never again, but of something which He is doing always and forever. The
Christ Consciousness is there forever to feed us. Jesus did not do something
once in Palestine,
but continues doing it today. Whenever Jesus comes into a man’s life, there
comes a new quality which is like turning water into wine. Without Jesus life
is dull, stale and flat, but when Jesus comes into our life, it becomes a
vivid, sparkling and exciting life, the joy of a wedding feast.
